Where Republicans Lost Control of Understanding Their Role in Declaring War, Thomas Massie Remembered

Jan 20, 2024

In a recent report from PressTV, a sobering critique emerges regarding the Biden regime's unilateral decision to launch airstrikes in Yemen. This move, bypassing congressional approval, has been met with a chorus of disapproval from various lawmakers, with Rep. Thomas Massie's voice standing out for its constitutional clarity. For those of us who champion libertarian-conservative values, this situation underscores a critical issue: the erosion of our constitutional order and the rule of law concerning the use of military force.

The premise of the PressTV article is clear: the Biden regime, by conducting airstrikes in Yemen without seeking Congress’s sanction, has violated the U.S. Constitution. This action has sparked ire among several lawmakers, including Washington Democrat and Progressive Caucus chair Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal and Rep. Rashida Tlaib, who have condemned these airstrikes as unconstitutional. However, it’s Rep. Thomas Massie’s stance that resonates deeply with the libertarian-conservative ethos.

Rep. Massie, a staunch advocate for constitutional adherence, underscores a troubling trend we’ve seen for decades, the persistent refusal of Congress to assert its authority, especially in matters of war and peace. His observations are a wake-up call to limited-government conservatives. For too long, there has been a disturbing silence, or at worst, passive acquiescence among many in our ranks when it comes to unchecked executive military action. This silence is a betrayal of our commitment to uphold the Constitution and the rule of law.

The Constitution is unequivocal in its allocation of powers, clearly showing that it is Congress, not the President, that has the authority to declare war. This distribution of powers is a deliberate design to prevent the kind of autocratic rule our forefathers rebelled against. When the executive branch bypasses this critical check and balance, it not only undermines the Constitution but also sets a dangerous precedent that erodes the very foundations of our democratic system.

Rep. Massie's call for Congress to reassert its authority isn’t just about constitutional fidelity, it’s about ensuring that the momentous decision to engage in military conflict is subjected to rigorous debate and scrutiny. It's about protecting American lives and resources from being entangled in endless, often unnecessary, foreign conflicts. The libertarian-conservative ethos is grounded in the principles of limited government, individual liberty, and fiscal responsibility. Unilateral military actions run counter to these principles, leading to unchecked government power, loss of life, and skyrocketing national debt.

As we look toward the future, particularly with the upcoming elections, it is imperative that we, as upholders of the Constitution, demand our representatives and leaders uphold the constitutional order. We must support and defend lawmakers like Rep. Massie, who are brave enough to stand against the tide of executive overreach. We need voices in Congress willing to challenge the status quo, to hold the executive accountable, and to safeguard the principles upon which our nation was founded.

In conclusion, the recent airstrikes in Yemen and the response from lawmakers like Rep. Massie should serve as a clarion call for all limited-government conservatives. It’s time to recommit ourselves to defending our constitutional order, to ensuring that decisions of war and peace are made with the full consent and deliberation of the representatives of the people. Only then can we truly claim to be champions of liberty, democracy, and the rule of law.

NEXT: Ignore John Bolton So We Can Avoid the Path to Conflict With Iran

José Niño Unfiltered

Discussion about this post