The Russo-Ukrainian War Offers a New Opportunity for Political Demagogues to Destroy Freedoms at Home

José Alberto Niño

May 11, 2022

Politicians thoroughly enjoy times of war.

Periods of bellicosity are when the most power-hungry members of the political class indulge in their most depraved political fantasies. The Russo-Ukrainian War has been no exception to this trend.

Western politicians have been taking advantage of the largest conventional military conflict on European soil since World War II to crack down on civil liberties at home and drag their countries closer to an open conflict with a nuclear power in Russia. Though the domestic measures Western governments have pursued have been particularly breathtaking.

For example, the European Union (EU) has already banned Russian state media outlets as RT and Sputnik for allegedly spreading disinformation. In the United States, which possesses stronger free speech protections at the political level, the assaults against freedom of expression had taken a more corporate hue. For example, Big Tech juggernauts such as Google have enthusiastically blocked channels receiving funding from Russia.

Even more egregious have been the actions of EU and NATO members such as the Czech Republic and Slovakia. These countries have criminalized any behavior that could be construed as being in support of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Similarly, Latvia has adopted a police hotline where citizens can report individuals who manifest support for Russia’s military action in Ukraine. Several German states have pushed the envelope even further by prosecuting individuals who display the “Z” symbol connected to Russia’s military campaign.

Indeed, the corporate press and governments are setting a startling precedent. The definition of “pro-Russian” content could be potentially broadened to attack anti-war activists and non-interventionists who are skeptical of Western countries trying to get involved in the Russo-Ukrainian war.

While the Russian invasion of Ukraine is horrific, there needs to be honest discussions about this invasion and what led up to it. International relations scholars John Mearsheimer have talked about how US foreign policy moves such as NATO expansion helped create the conditions for the present great power tragedy. For simply putting forth an alternative theory to what caused the present security crisis, Mearsheimer was nearly subjected to a struggle session from University of Chicago students who adamantly refused to entertain the professor’s contrarian views.

Given the trajectory of where things are heading, it would not be a stretch to suggest that even realist critiques of Western foreign policy could be subject to social and political sanctions. The simple act of pointing out that the US’s geopolitical ambitions have played a significant role in creating the present instability could be treated as “pro-Russian” speech if Deep State proponents had their way.

Dissidents getting punished for their anti-war views is nothing new in American history. Socialist leader Eugene V. Debs learned this the hard way during World War I. To make sure that America’s war effort went unchallenged, the Wilson administration passed the Espionage Act in 1917, with the Sedition Act subsequently being passed in 1918.

These bills imposed harsh criminal penalties. On June 16, 1918, Debs gave a speech in Canton, Ohio imploring attendees to resist the World War I draft. Debs’ actions would eventually land him in trouble with the law, as he was charged with ten counts of sedition. The socialist activist would receive a prison sentence of 10 years and face a lifetime of disenfranchisement.

It took a pardon from President Warren G Harding, one of the most pilloried presidents by court historians, to finally get him out of jail towards the end of 1921.

Later on during the Vietnam War there were several cases of the FBI surveilling anti-war groups or even infiltrating them to hinder their effectiveness. As Randolph Bourne proclaimed in an unfinished manuscript, “War is the health of the State.” It remains so as western governments are working overtime to augment their power during a great power conflict.

Self-proclaimed liberal democracies already showed their true colors during the COVID-19 pandemic, when they treated their citizens like mere cattle to be poked and prodded by whimsical technocrats. Now, they’ve further manifested their pent-up tyrannical desires as the Russo-Ukrainian War rages on.

An integral part of the West's unique value proposition is its respect for civil liberties, something countless societies have never enshrined in their governing documents. But now that has drastically changed. The haughty rhetoric coming from Western governments about being pro-freedom is vacuous at best when observing their actual behavior.

The irony here is that the West has fallen down the classic “you become what you fight” path. The very Western countries that pound their chest about their exceptionalism are now morphing into the countries they rail against.

Politics is not without a sense of irony.